Most coaching testimonials are useless. Not untrue — useless. "Working with Sarah was transformative. She really listened and I felt so supported." Every word of that may be sincere, and it persuades nobody, because it describes a feeling rather than a situation, and prospective clients are shopping for someone who understands their situation.
The reason testimonials come out this way is that coaches ask for "a testimonial," which is a request for praise. Ask a better question and you get a better answer.
What a Useful Testimonial Contains
Three things, in this order:
- The before. Specific enough that a stranger with the same problem recognises it.
- What changed. Concrete and behavioural, not emotional.
- The hesitation. What almost stopped them hiring you — the most persuasive sentence in any testimonial, and the one nobody thinks to ask for.
That third element does the heavy lifting because it addresses the objection your reader is currently having, in the words of someone who had it and proceeded anyway.
The Five Questions
Send these rather than asking for a testimonial. Tell them a few sentences per question is plenty.
- What was going on for you before we started?
- What made you hesitate about working with a coach — or with me?
- What is different now that would have surprised you six months ago?
- What would you say to someone in the position you were in?
- Is there anything you expected that did not happen?
Question 5 rarely makes the website, and you should ask it anyway. It is the most honest feedback you will get about the gap between what you promise and what you deliver.
When to Ask
Not at the end. At the end, the engagement is already receding and the specifics have blurred.
Ask immediately after a visible win, mid-engagement. The detail is sharp, the feeling is present, and — usefully — the client is not yet in the reflective mood that produces generic praise. A testimonial captured in month three and lightly updated at the end beats one written cold in month six.
Making It Easy to Say Yes
Offer to draft it. This feels uncomfortable and is standard practice: take their answers, shape them into a paragraph in their voice, and send it back with "does this feel accurate — change anything that is not right?" Most people are relieved. The words remain theirs; you have removed the writing task.
Also offer attribution options up front: full name, first name and role, or role only. Clients decline testimonials far more often over visibility than over sentiment, and "Head of Engineering, fintech scale-up" is nearly as persuasive as a name.
Where the Before Comes From
Here is the practical problem. Question 1 asks a client to describe a version of themselves they no longer are — and people are notoriously poor at this. Improvement becomes the new normal within weeks, and the memory of the starting point erodes with it. What you get is a reconstruction, sanded down.
The coaches who get vivid "before" answers are the ones who can hand the client something: their own words from intake, or the check-in from the week everything was difficult. Shown their own baseline, people become specific immediately.
That is one more reason the intake questions earn their keep, and why the record that accumulates between sessions in Interlude is worth more than it appears at the time.
Two Things Not to Do
- Do not incentivise. A discount in exchange for a testimonial buys you compliments and costs you credibility.
- Do not publish anything a client has not explicitly approved in final form — including the attribution. Confidentiality is the product.
Sign in to join the conversation.
Sign In